[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201003192049.34665.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 2010 20:49:34 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: mgross@...ux.intel.com
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, 640E9920 <640e9920@...il.com>,
linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dwalker@...eaurora.org, tiwai@...e.de, bruce.w.allan@...el.com,
aili@...eaurora.org, khilman@...prootsystems.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PM_QOS updates for 2.6.34-rc1
On Friday 19 March 2010, mark gross wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 14, 2010 at 07:26:37AM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > On Sat 2010-03-13 16:34:25, 640E9920 wrote:
> > > The following patch series implements to following:
> > > 1) pm_qos now uses a handle based implementation. No more string
> > > compares while walking lists.
> > > 2) renames the exports to using more accurate names.
> > > 3) updates kernel clients of pm_qos per this change
> > > 4) added ascii interface to pmqos recognizing strings formatted in 10
> > > charactor format "0x12345678"
> > > 5) added new pm_qos class, "system_bus_throughput"
> > >
> > > I would like to see this series make it into 2.6.34 if its not too late.
> >
> > I believe it is... -rc1 is past us.
>
> crap. I'll guess I'll redo them for next then.
>
>
>
> > Also... the way the patches are structured... that will break bisect,
> > no?
>
> Um not sure, how would you recomend I structure them?
Generally speaking, the kernel should build and should work correctly after
applying each consecutive patch in the series.
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists