[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100319023340.GA28941@Krystal>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 22:33:40 -0400
From: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, josh@...htriplett.org, dvhltc@...ibm.com,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu, dhowells@...hat.com,
eric.dumazet@...il.com, Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tree/tiny rcu: Add debug RCU head option (v2)
* Paul E. McKenney (paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 09:30:24PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> > Poisoning the rcu_head callback list.
> >
> > Helps finding racy users of call_rcu(), which results in hangs because list
> > entries are overwritten and/or skipped.
> >
> > A lot of non-initialized rcu list heads will be found with this option enabled.
> > It is important to do not just blindly initialize them before each call_rcu, but
> > rather to perform the initialization at the proper location, after the memory
> > has been allocated, so we can effectively detect incorrect call_rcu users.
> >
> > This patch version does not use "debug objects", although it probably should.
> > Some day I might find time to look into this transition, but the patch is usable
> > as is.
> >
> > The weird #ifdef in the networking code comes from an agreement with Eric
> > Dumazet about how to disable the build check for the networking code. For those
> > who wonder about the existence of this build-time check: it generates a build
> > error when the size of struct dst_entry grows (because it is very performance
> > sensitive). So the agreement here has been to disable the check when the
> > DEBUG_RCU_HEAD config option is active.
>
> If this one finds at least one bug (or if the previous version found
> at least one bug -- bad memory day here), then I will push it.
I had to create this patch when I was trying to pinpoint some RCU-related
issues. I think it turned out to be coming more from the cpu hotplug side than
from the call_rcu() side, but this is really one more tool in the toolbox.
Trying to find out if it detect actual misuses that we currently have will
depend on tracking down all the non-initialized rcu_head structures. I already
got a few for 2.6.32, but there seem to be more in 2.6.33. Again, I'll try to
spot and correct them as time permits me.
I already have spotted 6 non-initialized rcu heads, with more to come.
> It can
> always be improved later, right?
Absolutely.
>
> The patch looks good to me.
Great! :)
Mathieu
>
> Thanx, Paul
>
> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>
> > CC: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > CC: mingo@...e.hu
> > CC: akpm@...ux-foundation.org
> > CC: mingo@...e.hu
> > CC: laijs@...fujitsu.com
> > CC: dipankar@...ibm.com
> > CC: josh@...htriplett.org
> > CC: dvhltc@...ibm.com
> > CC: niv@...ibm.com
> > CC: tglx@...utronix.de
> > CC: peterz@...radead.org
> > CC: rostedt@...dmis.org
> > CC: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
> > CC: dhowells@...hat.com
> > CC: eric.dumazet@...il.com
> > CC: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
> > CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> > ---
> > include/linux/rcupdate.h | 13 ++++++++++++-
> > include/net/dst.h | 2 ++
> > kernel/rcutiny.c | 9 +++++++++
> > kernel/rcutree.c | 10 ++++++++++
> > lib/Kconfig.debug | 9 +++++++++
> > 5 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/rcupdate.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2010-03-18 20:27:25.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/linux/rcupdate.h 2010-03-18 20:30:54.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -49,6 +49,9 @@
> > struct rcu_head {
> > struct rcu_head *next;
> > void (*func)(struct rcu_head *head);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_HEAD
> > + struct rcu_head *debug;
> > +#endif
> > };
> >
> > /* Exported common interfaces */
> > @@ -71,11 +74,19 @@ extern void rcu_init(void);
> > #error "Unknown RCU implementation specified to kernel configuration"
> > #endif
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_HEAD
> > +#define RCU_HEAD_INIT { .next = NULL, .func = NULL, .debug = NULL }
> > +#define INIT_RCU_HEAD(ptr) do { \
> > + (ptr)->next = NULL; (ptr)->func = NULL; (ptr)->debug = NULL; \
> > +} while (0)
> > +#else
> > #define RCU_HEAD_INIT { .next = NULL, .func = NULL }
> > -#define RCU_HEAD(head) struct rcu_head head = RCU_HEAD_INIT
> > #define INIT_RCU_HEAD(ptr) do { \
> > (ptr)->next = NULL; (ptr)->func = NULL; \
> > } while (0)
> > +#endif
> > +
> > +#define RCU_HEAD(head) struct rcu_head head = RCU_HEAD_INIT
> >
> > #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_LOCK_ALLOC
> > extern struct lockdep_map rcu_lock_map;
> > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/rcutree.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/rcutree.c 2010-03-18 20:27:25.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/rcutree.c 2010-03-18 20:31:16.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
> > #include <asm/atomic.h>
> > #include <linux/bitops.h>
> > #include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/poison.h>
> > #include <linux/completion.h>
> > #include <linux/moduleparam.h>
> > #include <linux/percpu.h>
> > @@ -1060,6 +1061,10 @@ static void rcu_do_batch(struct rcu_stat
> > next = list->next;
> > prefetch(next);
> > trace_rcu_tree_callback(list);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_HEAD
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(list->debug != LIST_POISON1);
> > + list->debug = NULL;
> > +#endif
> > list->func(list);
> > list = next;
> > if (++count >= rdp->blimit)
> > @@ -1350,6 +1355,11 @@ __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *head, void (
> > unsigned long flags;
> > struct rcu_data *rdp;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_HEAD
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(head->debug);
> > + head->debug = LIST_POISON1;
> > +#endif
> > +
> > head->func = func;
> > head->next = NULL;
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/lib/Kconfig.debug
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/lib/Kconfig.debug 2010-03-18 20:27:25.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/lib/Kconfig.debug 2010-03-18 20:27:38.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -661,6 +661,15 @@ config DEBUG_LIST
> >
> > If unsure, say N.
> >
> > +config DEBUG_RCU_HEAD
> > + bool "Debug RCU callbacks"
> > + depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> > + depends on TREE_RCU
> > + help
> > + Enable this to turn on debugging of RCU list heads (call_rcu() usage).
> > + Seems to find problems more quickly with stress-tests in single-cpu
> > + mode.
> > +
> > config DEBUG_SG
> > bool "Debug SG table operations"
> > depends on DEBUG_KERNEL
> > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/include/net/dst.h
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/include/net/dst.h 2010-03-18 20:27:25.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/include/net/dst.h 2010-03-18 20:35:02.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -159,7 +159,9 @@ static inline void dst_hold(struct dst_e
> > * If your kernel compilation stops here, please check
> > * __pad_to_align_refcnt declaration in struct dst_entry
> > */
> > +#ifndef CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_HEAD
> > BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct dst_entry, __refcnt) & 63);
> > +#endif
> > atomic_inc(&dst->__refcnt);
> > }
> >
> > Index: linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/rcutiny.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6-lttng.orig/kernel/rcutiny.c 2010-03-18 20:35:14.000000000 -0400
> > +++ linux-2.6-lttng/kernel/rcutiny.c 2010-03-18 20:39:12.000000000 -0400
> > @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> > #include <linux/init.h>
> > #include <linux/time.h>
> > #include <linux/cpu.h>
> > +#include <linux/poison.h>
> >
> > /* Global control variables for rcupdate callback mechanism. */
> > struct rcu_ctrlblk {
> > @@ -163,6 +164,10 @@ static void __rcu_process_callbacks(stru
> > while (list) {
> > next = list->next;
> > prefetch(next);
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_HEAD
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(list->debug != LIST_POISON1);
> > + list->debug = NULL;
> > +#endif
> > list->func(list);
> > list = next;
> > }
> > @@ -210,6 +215,10 @@ static void __call_rcu(struct rcu_head *
> > {
> > unsigned long flags;
> >
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_RCU_HEAD
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(head->debug);
> > + head->debug = LIST_POISON1;
> > +#endif
> > head->func = func;
> > head->next = NULL;
> >
> >
> > --
> > Mathieu Desnoyers
> > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
> > EfficiOS Inc.
> > http://www.efficios.com
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists