linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] PPC: Skip over OF_DT_NOP when unflattening the device tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100319060621.GC28042@obsidianresearch.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:06:21 -0600
From:	Jason Gunthorpe <jgunthorpe@...idianresearch.com>
To:	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Cc:	linuxppc-dev@...abs.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] PPC: Skip over OF_DT_NOP when unflattening the device tree

On Fri, Mar 19, 2010 at 04:50:38PM +1100, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-03-09 at 12:30 -0700, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > NOPs within the property section are skipped, but NOPs between
> > OF_DT_END_NODE and OF_DT_BEGIN_NODE were not. My firmware NOPs out
> > entire nodes depending on various environment parameters.
> > 
> > of_scan_flat_dt already handles NOP more generally..
> 
> Good catch, though that code has now moved over to drivers/of
> and is a bit different. Grant is going to fix it up though.

Ah, I based the patch off 2.6.33.. 

Grant: let me know if you need some help/testing, nice to run into you
again.

Jason
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/