lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sat, 20 Mar 2010 16:06:32 +0100
From:	Mikael Pettersson <mikpe@...uu.se>
To:	David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Cc:	Paulius Zaleckas <paulius.zaleckas@...il.com>, nico@....org,
	rth@...ddle.net, nico@...xnic.net, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
	simon.kagstrom@...insight.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MTD: Fix Orion NAND driver compilation with ARM OABI

David Woodhouse writes:
 > On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 13:20 +0200, Paulius Zaleckas wrote:
 > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 11:41 AM, David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org> wrote:
 > > > On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 10:55 +0200, Paulius Zaleckas wrote:
 > > >> -             uint64_t x;
 > > >> +             /*
 > > >> +              * force x variable to r2/r3 registers since ldrd instruction
 > > >> +              * requires first register to be even.
 > > >> +              */
 > > >> +             register uint64_t x asm ("r2");
 > > >> +
 > > >>               asm volatile ("ldrd\t%0, [%1]" : "=&r" (x) : "r" (io_base));
 > > >
 > > > Hm, isn't there an asm constraint which will force it into an
 > > > appropriate register pair?
 > > 
 > > Not that I know of...
 > > 
 > > > Failing that, "=&r2,r4,r6,r8" ought to work.
 > > 
 > > No, fails with error: matching constraint not valid in output operand
 > 
 > Hm, crap -- GCC on ARM doesn't let you give specific registers, so that
 > trick doesn't work.

I missed the start of this thread, but looking at orion_nand.c I fail to
see why you'd need to mess with inline asm for reading a sequence of u64
values from an I/O location to an array.

Rewriting that to proper C generates a nice ldrd;strd loop with my gcc-4.4.3.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ