[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BA504DD.2060107@imap.cc>
Date: Sat, 20 Mar 2010 18:24:45 +0100
From: Tilman Schmidt <tilman@...p.cc>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, apw@...onical.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add check for too short Kconfig descriptions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 2010-03-20 15:07 schrieb Andi Kleen:
> The warning merely is intended to get people to think
> about that. Yes it cannot enforce it directly.
Then change the wording, at least. With the current wording, people will
think, "But I did!", and complain about a false positive on LKML, where
they will be annoyed to learn that checkpatch.pl's criterion for
"describing fully" is "having at least four lines".
But even with a better wording, I think the warning will still do more
harm than good.
> Yes it's not a perfect measure and can be circumvented. But hopefully
> most users would not.
I'm not thinking of circumvention, but of well-meaning authors writing
long explanations that describe everything the author found worth
mentioning, but still don't answer the essential question: "Should I
select that option?" In fact, most of the unhelpful Kconfig help texts
I've encountered where longer than four lines. :-)
Thanks,
Tilman
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.12 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iEYEARECAAYFAkulBN0ACgkQQ3+did9BuFtg4QCeNBnPAbMg3+dYfoimlG5/lQZ/
vRYAniohcXcoeC3+59eKSWwZ3B4fJ6Ix
=E5sA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists