[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100321015925.GA26625@pengutronix.de>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 02:59:26 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-input@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/24] input/keyboard: fix dangling pointers
Hello Dmitry,
On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 12:20:07PM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Hi Wolfram,
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2010 at 03:12:47PM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> > Fix I2C-drivers which missed setting clientdata to NULL before freeing the
> > structure it points to. Also fix drivers which do this _after_ the structure
> > was freed already.
> >
>
> I am not sure if setting clientdata to NULL before freeing the data is
> that important; we really want to be sure that we don't leave clientdata
> dangling when we finish unbinding the driver. If there are another
> thread the change will not really help the problem of accessing
> non-existing client data.
I agree it won't matter in practice. Jean and I concluded it is better
style, though (http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.i2c/5392).
Still, I will not insist and leave it up the subsystem maintainers, of
course. I also won't check for that case again in the future.
> I will apply lm8323 portion of the patch but leave qt2160 as is.
Thanks!
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists