[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100321210011.GD30194@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 22:00:11 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Antoine Martin <antoine@...afix.co.uk>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
oerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, ziteng.huang@...el.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single
project
* Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 03/21/2010 09:59 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >Frankly, i was surprised (and taken slightly off base) by both Avi and Anthony
> >suggesting such a clearly inferior "add a demon to the guest space" solution.
> >It's a usability and deployment non-starter.
>
> It's only clearly inferior if you ignore every consideration against it.
> It's definitely not a deployment non-starter, see the tons of daemons that
> come with any Linux system. [...]
Avi, please dont put arguments into my mouth that i never made.
My (clearly expressed) argument was that:
_a new guest-side demon is a transparent instrumentation non-starter_
What is so hard to understand about that simple concept? Instrumentation is
good if it's as transparent as possible.
Of course lots of other features can be done via a new user-space package ...
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists