[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100322120354.GB21571@bicker>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:03:54 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
To: Christine Caulfield <ccaulfie@...hat.com>
Cc: David Teigland <teigland@...hat.com>,
Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@...hat.com>,
cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [patch] dlm: cleanup remove unused code
Smatch complains because "lkb" is never NULL. Looking at it, the original
code actually adds the new element to the end of the list fine, so we can
just get rid of the if condition. This code is four years old and no one
has complained so it must work.
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
diff --git a/fs/dlm/lock.c b/fs/dlm/lock.c
index 46ffd3e..f162de5 100644
--- a/fs/dlm/lock.c
+++ b/fs/dlm/lock.c
@@ -732,10 +732,7 @@ static void lkb_add_ordered(struct list_head *new, struct list_head *head,
if (lkb->lkb_rqmode < mode)
break;
- if (!lkb)
- list_add_tail(new, head);
- else
- __list_add(new, lkb->lkb_statequeue.prev, &lkb->lkb_statequeue);
+ __list_add(new, lkb->lkb_statequeue.prev, &lkb->lkb_statequeue);
}
/* add/remove lkb to rsb's grant/convert/wait queue */
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists