[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <jo2k77-9sp.ln1@chipmunk.wormnet.eu>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 12:00:51 +0000
From: Alexander Clouter <alex@...riz.org.uk>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: better/faster kernel tarball compression
Tomasz Chmielewski <mangoo@...g.org> wrote:
>
>> 403804160 linux-2.6.34-rc2.tar
>> 67479563 linux-2.6.34-rc2.tar.bz2
>> 58452531 linux-2.6.34-rc2.tar.lz
>
> Speaking of file sizes, xz[1] already provides better compression:
>
> xz -k -9 linux-2.6.34-rc2.tar
>
> 55320408 linux-2.6.34-rc2.tar.xz
>
> xz -e -k -9 linux-2.6.34-rc2.tar
>
> 54800808 linux-2.6.34-rc2.tar.xz
>
> One drawback of xz is that it's not multi-threaded, much like bzip2 or
> gzip; would be great if it could be changed.
>
For some time there has been a multi-threaded bzip2 called
pbzip2[1], for some time; hell even Debian has it :)
I have no idea why the original poster is trying to say how "all teh
awesome" his code is being faster, well 'duh' it is using all the cores
on $BOX rather than just a single one.
I would be interested in comparisons against pbzip2 and the amusingly
named pigz[2]...plus a bunch of memory use comparisons, my AR7 board
only has 16MB of RAM :)
Cheers
[1] http://compression.ca/pbzip2/ - supports stdio (de)compression
[2] http://www.zlib.net/pigz/ - no idea if this supports stdio
--
Alexander Clouter
.sigmonster says: Approved for veterans.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists