[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100322143212.GE14201@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:32:12 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
oerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, ziteng.huang@...el.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single
project
* Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com> wrote:
> On 03/22/2010 02:44 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >This is why i consider that line of argument rather dishonest ...
>
> I am not going to reply to any more email from you on this thread.
Because i pointed out that i consider a line of argument intellectually
dishonest?
I did not say _you_ as a person are dishonest - doing that would be an ad
honimen attack against your person. (In fact i dont think you are, to the
contrary)
An argument can certainly be labeled dishonest in a fair discussion and it is
not a personal attack against you to express my opinion about that.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists