[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BA783D5.3050205@xenotime.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:51:01 -0700
From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...hat.com>,
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>,
Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 9/10] Uprobes Documentation patch
On 03/21/10 22:34, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> Thanks for the review,
> The next version of the patchset will address your comments.
>
>>> +
>>> +This user-bkpt based version of Uprobes is implemented on the following
>>
>> s/bkpt/breakpoint/
>>
>
> Your comment however made me realize that I had used user-bkpt here
> rather than user_bkpt.
>
> user_bkpt is a layer that provides breakpoint insertion and removal.
> I wanted to mention that uprobes depends on user_bkpt layer.
> I think "This user_bkpt based version" is probably better than
> "This user-breakpoint based version"
I see. Sure, that's fine.
--
~Randy
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists