linux-kernel - Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single project

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BA79718.9060606@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:13:12 +0200
From:	Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
	Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
	"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
	Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
	oerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
	Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
	Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
	Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, ziteng.huang@...el.com,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
	Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single
 project

On 03/22/2010 06:08 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Avi Kivity<avi@...hat.com>  wrote:
>
>    
>> On 03/22/2010 04:32 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>      
>>> * Avi Kivity<avi@...hat.com>   wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> On 03/22/2010 02:44 PM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>>          
>>>>> This is why i consider that line of argument rather dishonest ...
>>>>>            
>>>> I am not going to reply to any more email from you on this thread.
>>>>          
>>> Because i pointed out that i consider a line of argument intellectually
>>> dishonest?
>>>
>>> I did not say _you_ as a person are dishonest - doing that would be an ad
>>> honimen attack against your person. (In fact i dont think you are, to the
>>> contrary)
>>>
>>> An argument can certainly be labeled dishonest in a fair discussion and it
>>> is not a personal attack against you to express my opinion about that.
>>>
>>>        
>> Sigh, why am I drawn into this.
>>
>> A person who uses dishonest arguments is a dishonest person. [...]
>>      
> That's not how i understood that phrase - and i did not mean to suggest that
> you are dishonest and i do not think that you are dishonest (to the contrary).
>    

Word games.

-- 
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/