linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Netfilter: Fix integer overflow in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BA7A3CF.8070503@trash.net>
Date:	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 18:07:27 +0100
From:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>
To:	wzt.wzt@...il.com
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Netfilter: Fix integer overflow in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c

wzt.wzt@...il.com wrote:
> The get.size field in the get_entries() interface is not bounded
> correctly. The size is used to determine the total entry size.
> The size is bounded, but can overflow and so the size checks may
> not be sufficient to catch invalid size. Fix it by catching size
> values that would cause overflows before calculating the size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhitong Wang <zhitong.wangzt@...baba-inc.com>
>
> ---
>  net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c  |    4 ++++
>  net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c |    4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
> index 4e7c719..6abd3d2 100644
> --- a/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
> +++ b/net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_tables.c
> @@ -1164,6 +1164,10 @@ get_entries(struct net *net, struct ipt_get_entries __user *uptr, int *len)
>  	}
>  	if (copy_from_user(&get, uptr, sizeof(get)) != 0)
>  		return -EFAULT;
> +
> +	if (get.size >= INT_MAX / sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries))
> +		return -EINVAL;

I can see that the size might cause an overflow in the addition with
sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries), but that would most likely cause a mismatch
with the actual table size and get aborted (should be fixed anyways I
guess). But I fail to find the overflow you're trying to prevent, which
I guess would be the result of a multiplication.

Please point me to the specific line in question. Thanks :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/