[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269291683.8599.79.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:01:23 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
yinghai@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from
e820.c to fw_memmap.c
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 10:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Those early_res patches were posted all over on lkml, it was literally
> hundreds of difficult patches, and now, months down the line, after we've
> tested and upstreamed it (with many nasty regressions fixed on x86 during the
> development of it) you come with a rigid "do it some other way, convert all of
> x86 over again or else" position.
There's an easy solution here. Leave that gunk in arch/x86 where it
belongs and if you want to unify things a bit, then do it at the -API-
level only, and leave the implementation where it is.
> I really wish non-x86 architectures apprecitated (and helped) the core kernel
> work x86 is doing, because it is subsidizing non-x86 architectures all the
> time.
I'm not even going to bother replying to that one
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists