linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #14950] tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <201003222234.19722.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date:	Mon, 22 Mar 2010 22:34:19 +0100
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org>,
	Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@...il.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [Bug #14950] tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1

On Monday 22 March 2010, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-03-21 at 21:30 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.32 and 2.6.33.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.32 and 2.6.33.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14950
> > Subject		: tbench regression with 2.6.33-rc1
> > Submitter	: Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
> > Date		: 2009-12-25 11:11 (87 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=126174044213172&w=4
> 
> This needs retest in tip.  I submitted some patchlets to shave a few
> cycles, with which my box (fwtw) shows zero regression 2.6.31 ->
> tip.today, whereas there was nothing but regression of up to ~6% in
> between, magnitude seemingly depending on phase-of-moon.  Actually,
> patched tip at submission time was a fraction above 31 throughput.
> Retesting today, it's a fraction of a percent below again (tbench is
> annoyingly jittery).
> 
> Hopefully, this tbench regression is on it's way to retirement.

Thanks for the update.

Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/