[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269294769.8599.88.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:52:49 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
yinghai@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from
e820.c to fw_memmap.c
On Mon, 2010-03-22 at 22:20 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> So no arguments from me at all about the code quality aspects - i just wanted
> to highlight the huge amount of non-trivial work Yinghai has invested into
> this already, with little external help, and that if possible it would be nice
> to minimize the upsetting of related x86 code if possible. Please help him out
> with more specific suggestions about how the two memory allocation spaces
> could be unified best, to serve the needs of all these architectures - if you
> have some spare time.
Why not start by unifying the APIs to it, while keeping the
implementation in the arch for now ? That would be a good first step and
would give us a good idea of what kind of requirements all the archs
have since to some extent those requirements need to be represented in
this API.
Cheers,
Ben.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists