[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100322215710.GB11526@brick.ozlabs.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:57:10 +1100
From: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
yinghai@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com,
jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] early_res: seperate common memmap func from
e820.c to fw_memmap.c
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 09:57:03PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Does this mean you disagree with that? (I think it's pretty factual, last i
> checked the usage stats of devel kernels was somewhere around 99.7%.)
Is that number obtained from Fedora downloads or something? I
wouldn't be surprised if desktop usage of bleeding-edge kernels is
near 100%, since basically all desktop machines are x86 these days.
I think that number would be biased against server and embedded
machines, but without knowing exactly what you're counting it's hard
to say.
In any case, I don't think the number of machines is particularly
relevant. Linux runs on maybe 1% of all desktop machines in the
world, according to numbers I've seen, but that doesn't make it
irrelevant or not worth working on.
Paul.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists