[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04391A4E90BB2149B010D22452FA16876F6C9279@HQ-EXCH-6.corp.brocade.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 16:12:55 -0700
From: Jing Huang <huangj@...cade.COM>
To: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>,
"linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] bfa: wrong fcport H2I message tested in bfa_fcport_isr()
This is not intended. Using penable_rsp or pdisable_rsp in this case doesn't have functional difference since it is a union, but it is confusing and should be fixed.
Thanks
Jing
-----Original Message-----
From: Roel Kluin [mailto:roel.kluin@...il.com]
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2010 1:49 PM
To: Jing Huang; linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org; Andrew Morton; LKML
Subject: [PATCH] bfa: wrong fcport H2I message tested in bfa_fcport_isr()
It appears that the wrong fcport H2I message was tested
Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
---
Was this intended?
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c
index c589488..5e5e6fe 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/bfa/bfa_fcport.c
@@ -1281,7 +1281,7 @@ bfa_fcport_isr(struct bfa_s *bfa, struct bfi_msg_s *msg)
break;
case BFI_FCPORT_I2H_DISABLE_RSP:
- if (fcport->msgtag == i2hmsg.penable_rsp->msgtag)
+ if (fcport->msgtag == i2hmsg.pdisable_rsp->msgtag)
bfa_sm_send_event(fcport, BFA_FCPORT_SM_FWRSP);
break;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists