[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100322064027.GG31621@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Sun, 21 Mar 2010 23:40:28 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Mike Isely <isely@...ox.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
Sujith Thomas <sujith.thomas@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] device_attributes: add sysfs_attr_init() for dynamic
attributes
Hi Wolfram,
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 07:21:17AM +0100, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> Made necessary by 6992f5334995af474c2b58d010d08bc597f0f2fe.
>
> Found by this semantic patch:
>
> @ init @
> type T;
> identifier A;
> @@
>
> T {
> ...
> struct device_attribute A;
> ...
> };
>
> @ main extends init @
> expression E;
> statement S;
> identifier err;
> T *name;
> @@
>
> ... when != sysfs_attr_init(&name->A.attr);
> (
> + sysfs_attr_init(&name->A.attr);
> if (device_create_file(E, &name->A))
> S
> |
> + sysfs_attr_init(&name->A.attr);
> err = device_create_file(E, &name->A);
> )
>
> While reviewing, I put the initialization to apropriate places.
>
My standard question - are all of these need to be dynamically
allocated?
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists