[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269241492.3485.16.camel@localhost>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 08:04:52 +0100
From: Robert Schöne <robert.schoene@...dresden.de>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
cpufreq <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] trace power_frequency events on the correct cpu (for
Intel x86 CPUs)
Am Sonntag, den 21.03.2010, 17:42 -0700 schrieb Arjan van de Ven:
> On 3/20/2010 14:37, Thomas Renninger wrote:
>
> > It also seem to be (hopefully) a minor feature for timechart, so this should
> > not hurt that much (yet).
>
> It's actually a major feature for timechart, and one of the key things I and a bunch of others
> inside Intel use timechart for.
>
It's a major feature for us too.
I suppose, the cpufreq_notify_transition calls are correct (meaning
being called for all related cpus) for every driver. So there's still
the option to include it in the POST_CHANGE section of this function.
Could this be okay for the both of you?
--
Robert Schoene
Technische Universitaet Dresden
Zentrum fuer Informationsdienste und Hochleistungsrechnen
01062 Dresden
Tel.: (0351) 463-42483, Fax: (0351) 463-37773
E-Mail: Robert.Schoene@...dresden.de
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists