[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100322233113.f17d0e0c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 23:31:13 -0400
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
WANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinderrajput@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch] kcore: fix test for end of list
On Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:05:09 +0300 Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com> wrote:
> "m" is never NULL here. We need a different test for the end of list
> condition.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@...il.com>
> ---
> Found with a static checker and compile tested only. Please review
> carefully.
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/kcore.c b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> index a44a789..b442dac 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/kcore.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/kcore.c
> @@ -490,7 +490,7 @@ read_kcore(struct file *file, char __user *buffer, size_t buflen, loff_t *fpos)
> }
> read_unlock(&kclist_lock);
>
> - if (m == NULL) {
> + if (&m->list == &kclist_head) {
> if (clear_user(buffer, tsz))
> return -EFAULT;
> } else if (is_vmalloc_or_module_addr((void *)start)) {
hm, that code's been there for five years. I wonder if it's actually necessary.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists