[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269327424.5953.12.camel@concordia>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 17:57:04 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, michal.simek@...alogix.com,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@...r.kernel.org,
microblaze-uclinux@...e.uq.edu.au
Subject: Re: [V2 PATCH 00/10] of: Consolidate scattered device node
pointers in struct device
On Thu, 2010-03-18 at 09:22 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> Currently, each of_device has a copy of the device tree node pointer in both
> .node, and in .dev.archdata.of_node (microblaze and powerpc) or
> .dev.archdata.prom_node (sparc). Also, other architectures will be adding
> CONFIG_OF support, and they will also need a reference to the device tree
> node pointer from struct device.
Assuming this is similar to your experimental-devicetree branch, as of
96b4b9d7 it causes a few build errors for me:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/head/2688/
Broken are 86xx/sbc8641d_defconfig, mpc83xx_defconfig,
mpc885_ads_defconfig, mpc85xx_defconfig, and pmac32_defconfig.
I haven't dug any further.
cheers
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists