[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <89kc63$gdp6nr@fmsmga002.fm.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:42:34 +0000
From: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: dri-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/18] i915: Provide config option for enabling tracepoints
Out of curiosity what motivated this patch? When adding the tracepoints,
I found the overhead of compiling in but not enabling them to be
insignificant, i.e. nearly unmeasurable in throughput benchmarks, so
didn't believe it warranted a config option. Especially one that advises
people to turn off what may be a useful aid in desktop systems.
Also is TRACER the right name, that would seem to confuse the option with
a standalone tracer as opposed to simply enabling tracepoints.
-ickle
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists