[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BA8C105.9020308@windriver.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 08:24:21 -0500
From: Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the kgdb tree with the input tree
On 03/22/2010 10:09 PM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Jason,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the kgdb tree got a conflict in
> drivers/char/keyboard.c between commit
> edc6e384f9d96e54a6d03068d3b03fa5b56b6449 ("Input: implement SysRq as a
> separate input handler") from the input tree and commit
> 4e4b600bf7160c11893bc3f4f8da8a70777b23ba ("When issuing an alt-sysrq-KEY
> sequence with the keyboard driver in the")
> from the kgdb tree.
>
> The latter changes code moved to another file by the former. I don't
> know how to fix this up, so I have just effectively reverted the kgdb
> commit for now - suggestions welcome.
>
> BTW, the author of that kgdb commit is "Jason Wessel Subject: [PATCH]
> <jason.wessel@...driver.com>".
>
>
I will drop mine for now. Dmitry and I have differing implementations
to solve the same sort of problem with trapping the sysrq. I had wanted
to test Dmitry's patch at some point soon.
I had updated kgdb-next to include the RFC patches for the keyboard and
kms code, but it is all removed again until we sort out which
implementation we will roll with.
Thanks,
Jason.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists