linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/5] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100323132737.GA8894@isilmar.linta.de>
Date:	Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:27:37 +0100
From:	Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
Cc:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	davej@...hat.com, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] powernow-k8: Add core performance boost support

Hey,

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 12:58:58PM +0100, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > It could already be set in arch/x86/kernel/cpu/amd.c and
> > powernow-k8 could use cpu_has(cpu, X86_FEATURE_CPB);
> 
> I'd still like to cache the cpb_capable value locally instead of getting
> x86_cpuinfo percpu var and querying it. Especially if this happens often
> and not only at driver init.

If it's a percpu var, isn't it local anyway?

Best,
	Dominik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/