| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20100323135925.GA1703@ucw.cz> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 14:59:25 +0100 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz> Cc: Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@...il.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: Writable limits (was Re: Linux 2.6.34-rc1) Hi! > > > It's out there now. I still have a few trees I already got pull requests > > > for, and that I want to look over a bit more (ceph, gdb tree etc), and > > > it's possible that I've just overlooked some other pull request. > > > > > > So if you feel like you sent me a pull request bit might have been > > > over-looked, please point that out to me > > > > Hi, yes, the writable limits tree: > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/3/5/219 > > > > Maybe it was ignored on purpose. Either way, I would like to know to > > decide whether to drop it from -next or not and wait for a 2.6.35 merge > > window. > > Seems like this was neither commented on, nor merged. I don't see any > serious objections to having this merged having been raised anywhere ... > > Any word on this? Maybe noone cars? Try to push it through akpm? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists