linux-kernel - possible huge regress

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <2A0D883F-2301-401B-BC35-D954AB7050D8@gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:43:52 +0100
From:	Anton Starikov <ant.starikov@...il.com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: possible huge regress

Hi,

We have benchmarked some multithreaded code here on 16-core/4-way opteron 8356 host on number of kernels (see below) and found strange results.
Up to 8 threads we didn't see any noticeable differences in performance, but starting from 9 threads performance diverges substantially. I provide here results for 14 threads

2.6.18-164.11.1.el5 (centos)

user time: ~60 sec
sys time: ~12 sec

2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 (fedora-12)

user time: ~60 sec
sys time: ~75 sec

2.6.33-0.46.rc8.git1.fc13.x86_64 (fedora-12 + rawhide kernel)

user time: ~60 sec
sys time: ~300 sec

In all three cases real time corresponds to given numbers.

Binary used for all three cases is exactly the same (compiled on centos).
Setups for all three cases so identical as possible (last two - the sanme fedore-12 booted with different kernels).
I submit to LKLM because I feel that this is some general kernel issue rather than RH-flavored kernel issue.

What can be reason of this regress in performance? Is it possible to tune something to recover performance on 2.6.18 kernel? 

I perf'ed on 2.6.32.9-70.fc12.x86_64 kernel

report (top part only):

43.64% dve22lts-mc [kernel] [k] _spin_lock_irqsave 
32.93% dve22lts-mc ./dve22lts-mc [.] DBSLLlookup_ret 
5.37% dve22lts-mc ./dve22lts-mc [.] SuperFastHash 
3.76% dve22lts-mc /lib64/libc-2.11.1.so [.] __GI_memcpy 
2.60% dve22lts-mc [kernel] [k] clear_page_c 
1.60% dve22lts-mc ./dve22lts-mc [.] index_next_dfs

stat: 
129875.554435 task-clock-msecs # 10.210 CPUs 
1883 context-switches # 0.000 M/sec 
17 CPU-migrations # 0.000 M/sec 
2695310 page-faults # 0.021 M/sec 
298370338040 cycles # 2297.356 M/sec 
130581778178 instructions # 0.438 IPC 
42517143751 cache-references # 327.368 M/sec 
101906904 cache-misses # 0.785 M/sec 

callgraph:

53.09%      dve22lts-mc  [kernel]                                         [k]
 _spin_lock_irqsave
                |          
                |--49.90%-- __down_read_trylock
                |          down_read_trylock
                |          do_page_fault
                |          page_fault
                |          |          
                |          |--99.99%-- __GI_memcpy
                |          |          |          
                |          |          |--84.28%-- (nil)
                |          |          |          
                |          |          |--9.78%-- 0x100000000
                |          |          |          
                |          |           --5.94%-- 0x1
                |           --0.01%-- 
[...]

                |          
                |--49.39%-- __up_read
                |          up_read
                |          |          
                |          |--100.00%-- do_page_fault
                |          |          page_fault
                |          |          |          
                |          |          |--99.99%-- __GI_memcpy
                |          |          |          |          
                |          |          |          |--84.18%-- (nil)
                |          |          |          |          
                |          |          |          |--10.13%-- 0x100000000
                |          |          |          |          
                |          |          |           --5.69%-- 0x1
                |          |           --0.01%-- 
[...]

                |           --0.00%-- 
[...]

                 --0.72%-- 
[...]


Anton.--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/