lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BA8F7BD.20401@kernel.org>
Date:	Tue, 23 Mar 2010 10:17:49 -0700
From:	Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To:	Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH -v3 1/2] lmb: seperate region array from lmb_region
 struct

On 03/23/2010 06:18 AM, Paul Mundt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:42:41AM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>
>> * Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>>>  void __init lmb_init(void)
>>>  {
>>> +	lmb.memory.region   = lmb_memory_region;
>>> +	lmb.memory.region_array_size   = ARRAY_SIZE(lmb_memory_region);
>>> +	lmb.reserved.region = lmb_reserved_region;
>>> +	lmb.reserved.region_array_size = ARRAY_SIZE(lmb_reserved_region);
>>> +
>>
>> That's rather unreadable and has random whitespace noise.
>>
>> Should be something like:
>>
>> 	lmb.memory.region		= lmb_memory_region;
>> 	lmb.memory.region_array_size	= ARRAY_SIZE(lmb_memory_region);
>> 	lmb.reserved.region		= lmb_reserved_region;
>> 	lmb.reserved.region_array_size	= ARRAY_SIZE(lmb_reserved_region);
>>
>> also, i'd suggest to shorten region_array_size to region_size (we know it's an 
>> array), so it would become:
>>
>> 	lmb.memory.region	 = lmb_memory_region;
>> 	lmb.memory.region_size	 = ARRAY_SIZE(lmb_memory_region);
>>
> I don't mean to be pedantic, but the LMB code already has a lot of
> region.size references so region_size looks a bit awkward. All of the
> accessors in linux/lmb.h use region_nr as the array index, so perhaps
> nr_regions would be less ambiguous.

@@ -26,7 +26,8 @@ struct lmb_property {
 struct lmb_region {
 	unsigned long cnt;
 	u64 size;
-	struct lmb_property region[MAX_LMB_REGIONS+1];
+	struct lmb_property *region;
+	unsigned long region_array_size;
 };

cnt is number of slots used.
size is memory size

can we use rgn_sz for region array size?

YH
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ