[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269368824.5109.159.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 19:27:04 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>,
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@...hat.com>, ziteng.huang@...el.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single
project
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 19:21 +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Sidenote: I really think we should come to a conclusion about the
> concept. KVM integration into perf is very useful feature to
> analyze virtualization workloads.
I always start my things with bare kvm, It would be very unwelcome to
mandate libvirt, or for that matter running a particular userspace in
the guest.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists