[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <C9A1C753-6105-460E-8E5C-828CC21F8113@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 20:30:19 +0100
From: Anton Starikov <ant.starikov@...il.com>
To: Robin Holt <holt@....com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance
On Mar 23, 2010, at 8:22 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 07:25:43PM +0100, Anton Starikov wrote:
>> On Mar 23, 2010, at 7:21 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
>>>> I will apply this commits to 2.6.32, I afraid current OFED (which I need also) will not work on 2.6.33+.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You should be able to simply set CONFIG_RWSEM_GENERIC_SPINLOCK=n,
>>> CONFIG_RWSEM_XCHGADD_ALGORITHM=y by hand, as I mentioned earlier?
>>
>> Hm. I tried, but when I do "make oldconfig", then it gets rewritten, so I assume that it conflicts with some other setting from default fedora kernel config. trying to figure out which one exactly.
>
> Have you tracked this down yet? I just got the patches applied against
> an older kernel and am running into the same issue.
I decided to not track down this issue and just applied patches. I understood that with this patches there is no need to change this config options. Am I wrong?
Anton--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists