[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BA924CD.1010201@bluewatersys.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 09:30:05 +1300
From: Ryan Mallon <ryan@...ewatersys.com>
To: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
CC: linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] arm: add a /proc/cpuinfo platform extension
H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
> Add an optional platform specific extension to /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> Many platforms have custom cpu information that could be exposed
> to user space using /proc/cpuinfo.
>
> Patch 1/2 adds the necessary core support to allow a platform
> specific callback to dump this information.
>
> Patch 2/2 adds a callback to mach-ep93xx and hooks up all the
> edb93xx platforms.
>
> Signed-off-by: H Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
I think this is unlikely to get merged in its current state. Russell has
mentioned issues with breaking userspace by changing /proc/cpuinfo. The
other problem I see is that you have a single callback for registering
the arch specific information. In you ep93xx example, each of the ep93xx
boards must add:
.arch_cpuinfo = ep93xx_cpuinfo,
If one of the boards has some additional information to make available,
it would need to reimplement the entire callback, which gets messy.
I think a better approach would be to have a separate file (say
/proc/archinfo) and use a list approach for displaying data. I'm
guessing that the data displayed in the archinfo file would be
immutable, so something like this (very rough, this would be
kernel/archinfo.c, or arch/arm/kernel/archinfo.c, or whatever):
struct archinfo_entry {
const char *name;
const char *value;
struct list_head list;
};
static LIST_HEAD(archinfo_entries);
int archinfo_add_entry(const char *name, const char *value)
{
struct archinfo_entry *entry;
entry = kzalloc(sizeof(struct archinfo_entry), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!entry)
return -ENOMEM;
entry->name = kzalloc(strlen(name) + 1), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!entry->name) {
kfree(entry);
return -ENOMEM;
}
strcpy(entry->name, name);
entry->value = kzalloc(strlen(value) + 1, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!entry->value) {
kfree(entry->name);
kfree(entry);
return -ENOMEM;
}
list_add(&entry->list, &archinfo_entries);
return 0;
}
static int archinfo_show(struct seq_file *s, void *v)
{
struct archinfo_entry *entry;
list_for_each_entry(entry, &archinfo_entries, list)
seq_printf(s, "%-20s: %s\n", entry->name, entry->value);
return 0;
}
static int archinfo_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
{
return single_open(file, archinfo_show, NULL);
}
static const struct file_operations archinfo_ops = {
.open = archinfo_open,
.read = seq_read,
.llseek = seq_lseek,
.release = single_release,
};
static int __init init_archinfo(void)
{
struct proc_dir_entry *proc;
if (list_empty(&archinfo_entries))
return 0;
proc = proc_create("archinfo", 0444, NULL, &archinfo_ops);
if (!proc)
return -ENOMEM;
return 0;
}
lateinit_call(init_archinfo);
A given board/arch can then have something like the following in its
init function:
static void __init myboard_init_archinfo(void)
{
char buffer[64];
snprintf(buffer, sizeof(buffer), "some stuff %d, %d\n",
val1, val2);
archinfo_add_entry("stuff", buffer);
}
That way, the arch core (eg arch/arm/mach-ep93xx/core.c) can create a
base set of entries, and the individual platforms/board files can append
additional information to it.
~Ryan
--
Bluewater Systems Ltd - ARM Technology Solution Centre
Ryan Mallon 5 Amuri Park, 404 Barbadoes St
ryan@...ewatersys.com PO Box 13 889, Christchurch 8013
http://www.bluewatersys.com New Zealand
Phone: +64 3 3779127 Freecall: Australia 1800 148 751
Fax: +64 3 3779135 USA 1800 261 2934
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists