[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.00.1003231602130.18017@i5.linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 16:04:35 -0700 (PDT)
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Anton Starikov <ant.starikov@...il.com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
stable@...nel.org
cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression
in performance
On Tue, 23 Mar 2010, Anton Starikov wrote:
>
> I think we got a winner!
>
> Problem seems to be fixed.
>
> Just for record, I used next patches:
>
> 59c33fa7791e9948ba467c2b83e307a0d087ab49
> 5d0b7235d83eefdafda300656e97d368afcafc9a
> 1838ef1d782f7527e6defe87e180598622d2d071
> 4126faf0ab7417fbc6eb99fb0fd407e01e9e9dfe
> bafaecd11df15ad5b1e598adc7736afcd38ee13d
> 0d1622d7f526311d87d7da2ee7dd14b73e45d3fc
Ok. If you have performance numbers for before/after these patches for
your actual workload, I'd suggest posting them to stable@...nel.org, and
maybe those rwsem fixes will get back-ported.
The patches are pretty small, and should be fairly safe. So they are
certainly stable material.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists