[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100322.195831.233398454.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 19:58:31 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: roel.kluin@...il.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, davej@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] via-velocity: FLOW_CNTL_RX does not disable Asymmetric
pause in set_mii_flow_control()
From: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:25:14 +0100
> Asymmetric pause was not disabled in the RX case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roel Kluin <roel.kluin@...il.com>
> ---
> I spotted this because In the FLOW_CNTL_RX and FLOW_CNTL_TX_RX
> cases the same code is executed, is the amendment below required?
The bit settings in the MII_ADVERTISE register should be:
1) RX and TX pause both requested
set only ADVERTISE_PAUSE_CAP
2) Only TX pause requested
set only ADVERTISE_PAUSE_ASYM
3) Only RX pause requested
set both ADVERTISE_PAUSE_CAP and ADVERTISE_PAUSE_ASYM
4) Neither TX nor RX pause requested
set nothing
(drivers/net/tg3.c:tg3_advert_flowctrl_1000t() is a good
reference point)
It would be easier to compare the VIA driver with the rest of
the world if it used the standard mii.h defines instead of
it's own private ones. That would be a good change to make at
some point.
Anyways, the correct fix is therefore something like:
diff --git a/drivers/net/via-velocity.c b/drivers/net/via-velocity.c
index 3a486f3..bc278d4 100644
--- a/drivers/net/via-velocity.c
+++ b/drivers/net/via-velocity.c
@@ -812,7 +812,7 @@ static void set_mii_flow_control(struct velocity_info *vptr)
case FLOW_CNTL_TX_RX:
MII_REG_BITS_ON(ANAR_PAUSE, MII_REG_ANAR, vptr->mac_regs);
- MII_REG_BITS_ON(ANAR_ASMDIR, MII_REG_ANAR, vptr->mac_regs);
+ MII_REG_BITS_OFF(ANAR_ASMDIR, MII_REG_ANAR, vptr->mac_regs);
break;
case FLOW_CNTL_DISABLE:
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists