linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Netfilter: Fix integer overflow in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <628d1651003222011v2389fc68u7ba009ae4b781884@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Mar 2010 11:11:22 +0800
From:	wzt wzt <wzt.wzt@...il.com>
To:	Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com>
Cc:	Patrick McHardy <kaber@...sh.net>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Netfilter: Fix integer overflow in net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c

> get.size is unsigned int, UINT_MAX is 0x FFFFFFFF, not 0x7FFFFFFF
> And you're metioning "addition", then why you're checking as "multiplication"?

oh, my falut:(  the patch is multiplication check, not addition check.
thanks for helping me:)

On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:37 AM, wzt wzt <wzt.wzt@...il.com> wrote:
>>> Patrick's point is that you're using "if (get.size >= INT_MAX /
>>> sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries))"
>>> So, did you find any chance that get.size * sizeof(struct
>>> ipt_get_entries) >= INT_MAX ?
>>>
>> would you carefully read my explain???
>> get.size is copy from the user space,  it can be set as 0x7fffffff,
>> addition with sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) can be overflow.
>>
>
> get.size is unsigned int, UINT_MAX is 0x FFFFFFFF, not 0x7FFFFFFF
> And you're metioning "addition", then why you're checking as "multiplication"?
>
>>> And, for the addition overflow, can it be caught by
>>>
>>> "if (*len != sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size)"  ???
>>>
>> sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size can be overflow as *len,
>> get.size is control by user space with copy_from_user().
>
>
>>
>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Xiaotian Feng <xtfeng@...il.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 9:34 AM, wzt wzt <wzt.wzt@...il.com> wrote:
>>>>> I can see that the size might cause an overflow in the addition with
>>>>> sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries)
>>>> That's the integer overflow i pointed.
>>>> get.size is copy from the user space,  it can be set as 0x7fffffff,
>>>> addition with sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) can be overflow.
>>>
>>> Patrick's point is that you're using "if (get.size >= INT_MAX /
>>> sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries))"
>>> So, did you find any chance that get.size * sizeof(struct
>>> ipt_get_entries) >= INT_MAX ?
>>>
>>> And, for the addition overflow, can it be caught by
>>>
>>> "if (*len != sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size)"  ???
>>>
>>>>
>>>>        if (*len != sizeof(struct ipt_get_entries) + get.size) {
>>>>                duprintf("get_entries: %u != %zu\n",
>>>>                         *len, sizeof(get) + get.size);
>>>>                return -EINVAL;
>>>>        }
>>>>
>>>> so, check get.size max value before addition with sizeof(struct
>>>> ipt_get_entries) to prevent the integer overflow.
>>>> --
>>>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
>>>> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
>>>> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>>>> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/