[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100322.215703.77339158.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Mar 2010 21:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: amwang@...hat.com
Cc: mpm@...enic.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, bridge@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
gospo@...hat.com, nhorman@...driver.com,
shemminger@...ux-foundation.org,
bonding-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, fubar@...ibm.com
Subject: Re: [RFC Patch 2/3] bridge: make bridge support netpoll
From: Cong Wang <amwang@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2010 12:39:35 +0800
> How could you let the bridge know netpoll is not sent to
> the one that doesn't support netpoll during setup? This will
> be complex, I am afraid.
Why does this matter at all?
I told you in another mail that we should do away with
these callbacks and all the crazy 'npinfo' assignments
and just do it in the generic code.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists