[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269429075.2500.5.camel@concordia>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 22:11:15 +1100
From: Michael Ellerman <michael@...erman.id.au>
To: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Cc: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] panic: Allow taint flag for warnings to be changed
from TAINT_WARN
On Sat, 2010-03-20 at 23:05 +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> WARN() is used in some places to report firmware or hardware bugs that
> are then worked-around. These bugs do not affect the stability of the
> kernel and should not set the usual TAINT_WARN flag. To allow for
> this, add WARN_TAINT() and WARN_TAINT_ONCE() macros that take a taint
> flag as argument.
..
> The architecture-specific changes here are untested and need to be
> reviewed by architecture maintainers.
I'm not one of them, but this at least builds on powerpc FWIW.
cheers
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (198 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists