[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100324114930.GG21147@csn.ul.ie>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 11:49:31 +0000
From: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Christian Ehrhardt <ehrhardt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>,
Jens Axboe <jens.axboe@...cle.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Corrado Zoccolo <czoccolo@...il.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 0/3] Avoid the use of congestion_wait under zone
pressure
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 07:38:37PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 11:50:54PM +0000, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > 2. TTY using high order allocations more frequently
> > fix title: ttyfix
> > fixed in mainline? yes, in 2.6.34-rc2
> > affects: 2.6.31 to 2.6.34-rc1
> >
> > 2.6.31 made pty's use the same buffering logic as tty. Unfortunately,
> > it was also allowed to make high-order GFP_ATOMIC allocations. This
> > triggers some high-order reclaim and introduces some stalls. It's
> > fixed in 2.6.34-rc2 but needs back-porting.
>
> It will go to the other stable kernels for their next round of releases
> now that it is in Linus's tree.
>
Great.
> > Next Steps
> > ==========
> >
> > Jens, any problems with me backporting the async/sync fixes from 2.6.31 to
> > 2.6.30.x (assuming that is still maintained, Greg?)?
>
> No, .30 is no longer being maintained.
>
Right, I won't lose any sleep over 2.6.30.dodo so :)
Thanks
--
Mel Gorman
Part-time Phd Student Linux Technology Center
University of Limerick IBM Dublin Software Lab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists