[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100324155041.GH14800@8bytes.org>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:50:41 +0100
From: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
To: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
Cc: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Sheng Yang <sheng@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
Jes Sorensen <Jes.Sorensen@...hat.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>, ziteng.huang@...el.com,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...hat.com>,
Fr?d?ric Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Gregory Haskins <ghaskins@...ell.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unify KVM kernel-space and user-space code into a single
project
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 05:43:31PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 03/24/2010 05:37 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> Even better. So a guest which breaks out can't even access its own
>> /sys/kvm/ directory. Perfect, it doesn't need that access anyway.
>
> But what security label does that directory have? How can we make sure
> that whoever needs access to those files, gets them?
>
> Automatically created objects don't work well with that model. They're
> simply missing information.
If we go the /proc/<pid>/kvm way then the directory should probably
inherit the label from /proc/<pid>/?
Same could be applied to /sys/kvm/guest/ if we decide for it. The VM is
still bound to a single process with a /proc/<pid> after all.
Joerg
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists