linux-kernel - Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <5D95EFF7-F924-4B0D-8B05-0D85697E315D@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 24 Mar 2010 01:03:09 +0100
From:	Anton Starikov <ant.starikov@...il.com>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
	stable@...nel.org, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm@...ck.org,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	bugzilla-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	bugme-daemon@...zilla.kernel.org,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] [Bug 15618] New: 2.6.18->2.6.32->2.6.33 huge regression in performance

Yes, it is included into my list.
When I will submit it into stable, I will include it also.

Anton

On Mar 24, 2010, at 12:55 AM, Linus Torvalds wrote:

> 
> 
> On Wed, 24 Mar 2010, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>> 
>> We havent had any stability problems with them, except one trivial build bug, 
>> so -stable would be nice.
> 
> Oh, you're right. There was that UML build bug. But I think that was 
> included in the list of commits Anton had - commit 4126faf0ab ("x86: Fix 
> breakage of UML from the changes in the rwsem system").
> 
> 		Linus

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/