[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100324181224.GA22456@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 19:12:24 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/1] proc: turn signal_struct->count into "int
nr_threads"
On 03/24, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> No functional changes, just s/atomic_t count/int nr_threads/.
Argh, I forgot to send "[PATCH 0/1]", please see below...
[PATCH -mm 0/1] proc: turn signal_struct->count into "int nr_threads"
Depends on
[PATCH -mm 1/2] proc_sched_show_task: use get_nr_threads()
[PATCH -mm 2/2] keyctl_session_to_parent: use thread_group_empty() to check singlethreadness
and on top of the trivial
[PATCH -mm] signals-clear-signal-tty-when-the-last-thread-exits.fix
I did "make allyesconfig" to test this change, but the compilation
failed because of unrelated bugs, and of course "count" is not really
grepable :/
However,
$ grep -nr --include=*.[ch] -E 'sig\w*->count' */ | grep -Ev 'sigh(and)?->count'
kernel/fork.c:827: atomic_set(&sig->count, 1);
and this "sig" above is in fact sighand.
Fortunately, if I missed some user of signal->count the necessary fix
will be really trivial. And I bet in this case that user should be
wrong anyway.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists