[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20100324222324.GA31154@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 23:23:24 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <matthew@....cx>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, jblunck@...e.de,
Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [GIT, RFC] Killing the Big Kernel Lock
* Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de> wrote:
> I've built-tested an allmodconfig kernel with CONFIG_BKL disabled on x86_64,
> i386, powerpc64, powerpc32, s390 and arm to make sure I catch all the
> modules that depend on BKL, and I've been running various versions of this
> tree on my desktop machine over the last few weeks while adding stuff.
Very nice work!
How about going one step further:
- remove CONFIG_BKL altogether
- remove all the remains of the BKL code in lib/kernel_lock.c and kernel/sched.c
- turn lock_kernel() into a WARN_ONCE() and unlock_kernel() into a NOP.
- ...
- Celebrate! :-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists