linux-kernel - [PATCH 0/2] Two patches for fs/super.c

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100324051140.10015.32854.stgit@notabene.brown>
Date:	Wed, 24 Mar 2010 16:12:23 +1100
From:	NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 0/2] Two patches for fs/super.c


Two patches.

 The second removes S_BIAS which is unnecessary and so potentially
 confusing.

 The first I found the need for while preparing the second patch.  It
 seems that get_active_super doesn't follow the pattern of all other
 code that walks the super_blocks list.

NeilBrown

---

NeilBrown (2):
      VFS: use __put_super_and_need_restart in get_active_super.
      fs/super: remove S_BIAS


 fs/notify/inotify/inotify.c |   33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
 fs/super.c                  |   20 ++++++++------------
 include/linux/fs.h          |    1 -
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)

-- 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/