[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20100325185021.63e16884.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:50:21 +0900
From: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To: Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/11] Direct compact when a high-order allocation fails
On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:48:26 +0000
Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie> wrote:
> > In that case, compact_finished() can't
> > find there is a free chunk and do more work. How about using a function like
> > free_pcppages_bulk(zone, pcp->batch, pcp);
> > to bypass pcp list and freeing pages at once ?
> >
>
> I think you mean to drain the PCP lists while compaction is happening
> but is it justified? It's potentially a lot of IPI calls just to check
> if compaction can finish a little earlier. If the pages on the PCP lists
> are making that much of a difference to high-order page availability, it
> implies that the zone is pretty full and it's likely that compaction was
> avoided and we direct reclaimed.
>
Ah, sorry for my short word again. I mean draining "local" pcp list because
a thread which run direct-compaction freed pages. IPI is not necessary and
overkill.
Thanks,
-Kame
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists