linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 02/11] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped anonymous pages

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20100325191229.8e3d2ba1.kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:12:29 +0900
From:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
To:	KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>
Cc:	Mel Gorman <mel@....ul.ie>, Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Adam Litke <agl@...ibm.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/11] mm,migration: Do not try to migrate unmapped
 anonymous pages

On Thu, 25 Mar 2010 18:59:25 +0900 (JST)
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com> wrote:

> > > > > Kosaki-san,
> > > > > 
> > > > >  IIUC, the race in memory-hotunplug was fixed by this patch [2/11].
> > > > > 
> > > > >  But, this behavior of unmap_and_move() requires access to _freed_
> > > > >  objects (spinlock). Even if it's safe because of SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU,
> > > > >  it't not good habit in general.
> > > > > 
> > > > >  After direct compaction, page-migration will be one of "core" code of
> > > > >  memory management. Then, I agree to patch [1/11] as our direction for
> > > > >  keeping sanity and showing direction to more updates. Maybe adding
> > > > >  refcnt and removing RCU in futuer is good.
> > > > 
> > > > But Christoph seems oppose to remove SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU. then refcount
> > > > is meaningless now.
> > > 
> > > Christoph is opposed to removing it because of cache-hotness issues more
> > > so than use-after-free concerns. The refcount is needed with or without
> > > SLAB_DESTROY_BY_RCU.
> > > 
> > 
> > I wonder a code which the easiest to be read will be like following.
> > ==
> > 
> >         if (PageAnon(page)) {
> >                 struct anon_vma anon = page_lock_anon_vma(page);
> > 		/* to take this lock, this page must be mapped. */
> > 		if (!anon_vma)
> > 			goto uncharge;
> > 		increase refcnt
> > 		page_unlock_anon_vma(anon);
> >         }
> > 	....
> > ==
> 
> This seems very good and acceptable to me. This refcnt usage
> obviously reduce rcu-lock holding time.
> 
> I still think no refcount doesn't cause any disaster. but I agree
> this is forward step patch.
> 

BTW, by above change and the change in patch [2/11], 
"A page turnd to be SwapCache and free unmapped but not freed"
page will be never migrated.

Mel, could you change the check as this ??

	if (PageAnon(page)) {
		rcu_read_lock();
		if (!page_mapcount(page)) {
			rcu_read_unlock();
			if (!PageSwapCache(page))
				goto uncharge;
			/* unmapped swap cache can be migrated */
		} else {
			...
		}
	.....
	} else 


Thx,
-Kame


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/