[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BAB54B0.3080109@panasas.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 14:18:56 +0200
From: Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...i.umich.edu>
CC: pNFS Mailing List <pnfs@...ux-nfs.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Doug Nazar <nazard.lkml@...il.com>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [pnfs] [GIT BISECT] first bad commit: 1f36f774 Switch !O_CREAT
case to use of do_last()
On Mar. 25, 2010, 14:07 +0200, Benny Halevy <bhalevy@...asas.com> wrote:
> On Mar. 25, 2010, 12:54 +0200, Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:12:31AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 11:39:38AM +0200, Boaz Harrosh wrote:
>>>
>>>> It makes no difference, fails just the same. Would an "strace" help?
>>> It might, especially if you ran it for identical repositories on local
>>> fs and on NFS; at least that way it would be possible to see where do
>>> they diverge...
>> I wonder... What happens if you add
>> if (error == -EISDIR)
>> printk("blah: %s", pathname);
>> right after do_lookup() call in do_last()? That would separate -EISDIR
>> coming from NFS from the same thing coming from fs/namei.c...
>
> Bingo.
> It is returned from do_lookup.
Indeed this error is coming from the server:
nfsd_dispatch: vers 4 proc 1
nfsv4 compound op #1/7: 22 (OP_PUTFH)
nfsd: fh_verify(16: 01010001 00000000 000e6592 345b9f25 00000000 00000000)
nfsv4 compound op ffff880076734078 opcnt 7 #1: 22: status 0
nfsv4 compound op #2/7: 32 (OP_SAVEFH)
nfsv4 compound op ffff880076734078 opcnt 7 #2: 32: status 0
nfsv4 compound op #3/7: 18 (OP_OPEN)
NFSD: nfsd4_open filename pack op_stateowner (null)
renewing client (clientid 4bab503e/00000002)
nfsd: nfsd_lookup(fh 16: 01010001 00000000 000e6592 345b9f25 00000000 00000000, pack)
nfsd: fh_verify(16: 01010001 00000000 000e6592 345b9f25 00000000 00000000)
nfsd: fh_compose(exp 08:05/106497 objects/pack, ino=943508)
nfsd: fh_verify(16: 01010001 00000000 000e6594 345b9f26 00000000 00000000)
nfsv4 compound op ffff880076734078 opcnt 7 #3: 18: status 21
nfsv4 compound returned 21
>
> @@ -1648,6 +1654,8 @@ static struct file *do_last(struct nameidata *nd, struct path *path,
> /* just plain open? */
> if (!(open_flag & O_CREAT)) {
> error = do_lookup(nd, &nd->last, path);
> + if (error == -EISDIR)
> + printk("%s: do_lookup returned -EISDIR %s\n", __func__, pathname);
> if (error)
> goto exit;
> error = -ENOENT;
>
>
>> _______________________________________________
>> pNFS mailing list
>> pNFS@...ux-nfs.org
>> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
> _______________________________________________
> pNFS mailing list
> pNFS@...ux-nfs.org
> http://linux-nfs.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pnfs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists