linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (staging/vt66*)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20100325130003.GB24056@alittletooquiet.net>
Date:	Thu, 25 Mar 2010 09:00:03 -0400
From:	Forest Bond <forest@...ttletooquiet.net>
To:	Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for March 24 (staging/vt66*)

Hi,

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 12:44:08PM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> On 03/23/10 22:17, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Changes since 20100323:
> 
> 
> 
> (.text+0x5d140): multiple definition of `hostap_set_hostapd'
> (.text+0x5ccab): multiple definition of `hostap_ioctl'
> 
> when
> CONFIG_HOSTAP=y
> and
> CONFIG_VT665[56]=y
> 
> or just both of the latter are =y.

Is there any way to limit CONFIG_VT665[56] to ("n", "m")?  That would be
sufficient as a work-around, right?

Or is it preferable to rename the offending functions?

Thanks,
Forest
-- 
Forest Bond
http://www.alittletooquiet.net
http://www.pytagsfs.org

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (190 bytes)