linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] isdn: Cleanup Sections in PCMCIA driver sedlbauer

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4BAB6E65.7@nachtwindheim.de>
Date:	Thu, 25 Mar 2010 15:08:37 +0100
From:	Henrik Kretzschmar <henne@...htwindheim.de>
To:	Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
CC:	isdn@...ux-pingi.de, davem@...emloft.net,
	linux@...inikbrodowski.net, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] isdn: Cleanup Sections in PCMCIA driver sedlbauer

Wolfram Sang schrieb:

> Hi Henrik,
>
> thanks for the work. Please, just keep the placement of those attributes
> consistent. Otherwise it might be easy to miss:
>
>   
>> -static int sedlbauer_config(struct pcmcia_device *link);
>> +static int sedlbauer_config(struct pcmcia_device *link) __devinit ;
>>     
>
> Wrong.
>
>   
>> -static int sedlbauer_probe(struct pcmcia_device *link)
>> +static int __devinit sedlbauer_probe(struct pcmcia_device *link)
>>  {
>>     
>
> Right.
>
> (I think checkpatch checks for this, too)
No, checkpatch doesn't claim about that.

Greets, Henrik

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/