[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1269541438.12097.107.camel@laptop>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 19:23:58 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, jesse.brandeburg@...el.com,
Arjan Van De Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Prevent nested interrupts when the IRQ stack is near
overflowing v2
On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 19:21 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-25 at 11:01 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Are there any cases around
> > that still have busy-loop delays based on real-time in their irq handlers?
> > I simply don't know.
>
> I recently found a few in drivers/net/ there's all kinds of funny stuff
> in there.. not sure how common the matching hardware is though.
>
> One thing we could do is instrument jiffies to yell when its used from
> hardirq context and fix up these things.
Also, Arjan mentioned he wanted to sweep the kernel for jiffies users
and convert them to timer interfaces..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists