[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201003252114.36605.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 21:14:36 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
jirislaby@...il.com, linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: what the patches do Re: [RFC 10/15] PM / Hibernate: user, implement user_ops reader
On Thursday 25 March 2010, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On 25/03/10 16:30, Pavel Machek wrote:
> [...]
>
> > I have some problems with sws_module_ops interface (handcoded locking
> > is too ugly to live), but it is better than I expected. But there may
> > be better solution available, one that does not need two interfaces to
> > maintain (we can't really get rid of userland interface). What about
> > this?
>
> Just picking up on that bracketed part: Can we flag the userland
> interface (and uswsusp) as being planned for eventual removal now... or
> at least agree to work toward that?
No, we can't.
> I'm asking because if we're going to make a go of getting the in-kernel
> code in much better shape, and we have Rafael, Jiri and I - and you? -
> all pulling in the same direction to improve it, there's going to come a
> point (hopefully not too far away) where uswsusp is just making life too
> difficult, and getting rid of it will be a big help.
We're not dropping user space interfaces used by every distro I know of.
Rafael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists