[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4BAAFED5.6070501@crca.org.au>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2010 17:12:37 +1100
From: Nigel Cunningham <ncunningham@...a.org.au>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
CC: linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>,
jirislaby@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [linux-pm] what the patches do Re: [RFC 10/15] PM / Hibernate:
user, implement user_ops reader
Hi again.
On 25/03/10 16:42, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> On 25/03/10 16:30, Pavel Machek wrote:
> [...]
>
>> I have some problems with sws_module_ops interface (handcoded locking
>> is too ugly to live), but it is better than I expected. But there may
>> be better solution available, one that does not need two interfaces to
>> maintain (we can't really get rid of userland interface). What about
>> this?
>
> Just picking up on that bracketed part: Can we flag the userland
> interface (and uswsusp) as being planned for eventual removal now... or
> at least agree to work toward that?
>
> I'm asking because if we're going to make a go of getting the in-kernel
> code in much better shape, and we have Rafael, Jiri and I - and you? -
> all pulling in the same direction to improve it, there's going to come a
I realised after sending this that the " - and you? - " was ambiguous. I
wasn't meaning to suggest that you might pull in a different direction,
but rather uncertainty as to whether you might help with the effort -
it's been a while (AFAIR) since you've done any hibernaton patches.
Humble apologies for the ambiguity!
Nigel
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists